Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bowman v. Phoenix Trinity Manufacturing, Inc., 3:18-cv-332. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20200102665 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 25); (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS (DOC. 19); AND (3) STAYING THESE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. 25), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recom
More

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 25); (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS (DOC. 19); AND (3) STAYING THESE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. 25), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) is ADOPTED in full; (2) Defendants' motion to compel arbitration and to stay proceedings (Doc. 19) is GRANTED; and (3) STAYING this case pending arbitration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer