Garrett v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution, 3:19-cv-191. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200107831
Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2019
Summary: RECOMMITTAL ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by petitioner Devin Garrett, is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 20) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations recommending dismissal of the Petition (ECF No. 19). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
Summary: RECOMMITTAL ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by petitioner Devin Garrett, is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 20) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations recommending dismissal of the Petition (ECF No. 19). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. ..
More
RECOMMITTAL ORDER
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by petitioner Devin Garrett, is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 20) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations recommending dismissal of the Petition (ECF No. 19).
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis.
Source: Leagle
