United States v. Hamed, 3:19-cr-153. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200109815
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2019
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This matter came before the Court for hearing on November 21, 2019 before United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, who thereafter issued a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. #9). Having conducted a full colloquy with Defendant, the Magistrate Judge concluded that his plea of guilty is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that there is an adequate factual basis for a finding him guilty as charged in the Information pending aga
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This matter came before the Court for hearing on November 21, 2019 before United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, who thereafter issued a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. #9). Having conducted a full colloquy with Defendant, the Magistrate Judge concluded that his plea of guilty is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that there is an adequate factual basis for a finding him guilty as charged in the Information pending agai..
More
DECISION AND ENTRY
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court for hearing on November 21, 2019 before United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, who thereafter issued a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. #9). Having conducted a full colloquy with Defendant, the Magistrate Judge concluded that his plea of guilty is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that there is an adequate factual basis for a finding him guilty as charged in the Information pending against him in this case.
The Court, noting that no objections to the Report and Recommendations have been filed and that the time for filing objections has expired, hereby ADOPTS in full said Report and Recommendations.
Therefore, based on the aforesaid, and this Court's de novo review of the record and the findings by the United States Magistrate Judge, this Court adopts the findings and recommendations of the United State Magistrate Judge, and finds that Defendant's guilty plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Final acceptance of Defendant's guilty plea is deferred pending review of the pre-sentence investigation report.
Source: Leagle
