Williams v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc., 1:19cv70. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200106a13
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2020
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on October 30, 2019 (Doc. 20), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired November 13, 2019, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, defendant's motion for judgment on t
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on October 30, 2019 (Doc. 20), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired November 13, 2019, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, defendant's motion for judgment on th..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on October 30, 2019 (Doc. 20), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired November 13, 2019, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 15) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
