Holt v. Hockett, 1:19cv583. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200107815
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 02, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2020
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on October 7, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on October 7, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc...
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on October 7, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, this complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915 (e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), with the exception of plaintiff's claim concerning the opening of his legal mail against defendant Hockett.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
