Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hagood v. Saul, 3:17-cv-273. (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20200107819 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 02, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2020
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #25); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (DOC. #23); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO REOPEN CASE PURSUANT TO CFR 404.989" (DOC. #28); CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED ON DOCKET WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . On September 24, 2018, the Court issued a Decision and Entry affirming the Commissioner's decision that Plaintiff was not disabled and terminating the case. Doc. #21. One yea
More

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #25); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (DOC. #23); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO REOPEN CASE PURSUANT TO CFR 404.989" (DOC. #28); CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED ON DOCKET

On September 24, 2018, the Court issued a Decision and Entry affirming the Commissioner's decision that Plaintiff was not disabled and terminating the case. Doc. #21. One year later, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Reopen Case and Relief from a Judgment or Order Under Federal Rule 60(b), Doc. #23. Defendant filed a response. Doc. #24.

On October 29, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman filed a Report and Recommendations, Doc. #25, recommending that the Court overrule Plaintiff's motion. Although Plaintiff was notified of her right to file Objections to that Report and Recommendations, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no Objections were filed within the time allotted.

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by Magistrate Judge Newman in the Report and Recommendations, as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing, Doc. #25, and OVERRULES Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case and Relief from a Judgment or Order Under Federal Rule 60(b), Doc. #23.

The Court notes that, on December 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed a "Motion to Reopen Case Pursuant to CFR 404.989," Doc. #28, attaching new medical records. The Court presumes that this is a reference to 20 C.F.R. § 404.989, which permits the Social Security Administration to reopen a determination if new and material evidence is furnished. Any such request, however, must be addressed to the Social Security Administration, not to the Court. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case Pursuant to CFR 404.989, Doc. #28.

The above-captioned case shall remain terminated on the Court's docket.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer