Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:19-cv-314. (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20200128f47 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2020
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . This Social Security disability appeal is before the Court on Plaintiff's complaint. On appeal before this Court, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer within seven (7) days from the entry of this Order to determine among counsel and the parties only whether consent to the undersigned is unanimous and, if so, to file the appropriate consent form which can be found at http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/ao085.pdf (also attached he
More

ORDER

This Social Security disability appeal is before the Court on Plaintiff's complaint. On appeal before this Court, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer within seven (7) days from the entry of this Order to determine among counsel and the parties only whether consent to the undersigned is unanimous and, if so, to file the appropriate consent form which can be found at http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/ao085.pdf (also attached hereto). Consent is voluntary and any party may withhold consent for any reason without adverse consequence.

The parties are directed to the Seventh Amended Magistrate Judge's General Order No. 11 (effective 4/26/16), which can be found on the Court's website at the following address: http://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/content/general-orders-ohio-southern-district. As set forth in General Order 11, all citations to the administrative record must reference the PageID.

The parties in this case are hereby GRANTED leave to stipulate to extensions of time of up to 28 days to file each of the following documents in this case: (1) Plaintiff's Statement of Errors; (2) the Commissioner's memorandum in opposition, and (3) Plaintiff's reply memorandum. Additional extensions of time, or any extensions of time in excess of 28 days, must be supported by good cause and approved by the Court. Requests for extensions in excess of 28 days on conclusory grounds (e.g., "heavy caseload" or "press of business") may be denied.

Prior to filing a memorandum in opposition to Plaintiff's Statement of Errors, the Commissioner is ORDERED to determine whether remand is appropriate and, if so, shall file a motion for remand in lieu of a memorandum in opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer