BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Aripov, 3:17-cv-00311. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200302b87
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2020
Summary: ORDER TERMINATING REQUIREMENT IN 11/26/2019 NOTATION ORDER AND ORDERING DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE MARCH 20, 2020 THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has received the Status Report filed by counsel for Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A. ("Plaintiff"). (Doc. 6.) Having reviewed a portion of the docket page for the bankruptcy case referenced in the Status Report (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No. 3:17-ck-32819), it appears that there is an error in the
Summary: ORDER TERMINATING REQUIREMENT IN 11/26/2019 NOTATION ORDER AND ORDERING DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE MARCH 20, 2020 THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has received the Status Report filed by counsel for Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A. ("Plaintiff"). (Doc. 6.) Having reviewed a portion of the docket page for the bankruptcy case referenced in the Status Report (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No. 3:17-ck-32819), it appears that there is an error in the S..
More
ORDER TERMINATING REQUIREMENT IN 11/26/2019 NOTATION ORDER AND ORDERING DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE MARCH 20, 2020
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court has received the Status Report filed by counsel for Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A. ("Plaintiff"). (Doc. 6.) Having reviewed a portion of the docket page for the bankruptcy case referenced in the Status Report (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No. 3:17-ck-32819), it appears that there is an error in the Status Report such that the Bankruptcy Court did not enter an order dismissing that case on February 25, 2019, but actually did so on February 24, 2020. (See Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No. 3:17-ck-32819 at Doc. 87.) The Court ORDERS that the requirement in its 11/26/2019 NOTATION ORDER that "Plaintiff's counsel provide the Court with a status update in regard to this case every 3 months" is TERMINATED.
Although Plaintiff requests in the Status Report that a schedule be set in this case pending before the undersigned, a review of the docket shows that Defendant Islom Aripov ("Defendant") has yet to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (Doc. 1). The Court ORDERS Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before March 20, 2020.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
