Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Godsey v. Airstream, Inc., 3:19-cv-107. (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20200319634 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2020
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING JOINT MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS FOR 30 DAYS (DOC. #30); OVERRULING WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING PLAINTIFFS' COMBINED MOTION TO STAY THE ISSUANCE OF COURT-SUPERVISED NOTICE PURSUANT TO 216(b) AND MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONFER REGARDING NOTICE (DOC. #28), AND JOINT MOTION TO STAY NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE ACTION (DOC. #29) WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . For good cause shown, the Court SUSTAINS the parties' Joint Motion to Stay All Proceedings fo
More

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING JOINT MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS FOR 30 DAYS (DOC. #30); OVERRULING WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING PLAINTIFFS' COMBINED MOTION TO STAY THE ISSUANCE OF COURT-SUPERVISED NOTICE PURSUANT TO § 216(b) AND MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONFER REGARDING NOTICE (DOC. #28), AND JOINT MOTION TO STAY NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE ACTION (DOC. #29)

For good cause shown, the Court SUSTAINS the parties' Joint Motion to Stay All Proceedings for 30 Days, Doc. #30, so that the parties can continue their settlement negotiations.

The Court OVERRULES the following motions WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling after the conference call to be held on April 3, 2020, at 5:00, if the parties are unable to reach a settlement:

• Plaintiffs' Combined Motion to Stay the Issuance of Court-Supervised Notice Pursuant to § 216(B) and Motion for an Extension of Time to Confer Regarding Notice (Doc. #28); and • Joint Motion to Stay Notice of Collective Action (Doc. #29)
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer