COLE v. MARTIN, CIV 11-297-FHS-KEW. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20120718a55
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2012
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY FRANK H. SEAY, District Judge. On this date the court dismissed petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus as barred by the statute of limitations. After careful review of the record, the court concludes petitioner has not shown "at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this]
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY FRANK H. SEAY, District Judge. On this date the court dismissed petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus as barred by the statute of limitations. After careful review of the record, the court concludes petitioner has not shown "at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this] c..
More
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
FRANK H. SEAY, District Judge.
On this date the court dismissed petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus as barred by the statute of limitations. After careful review of the record, the court concludes petitioner has not shown "at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this] court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). See also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
ACCORDINGLY, petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
