LIVERMAN v. GOLDEN, CIV-15-29-SPS. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20160204c93
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2016
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS STEVEN P. SHREDER , Magistrate Judge . A. The Plaintiff's Motion in Limine and Brief in Support [Docket No. 66] is GRANTED by agreement of the parties. B. Regarding Defendant's Motion and Brief in Limine [Docket No. 62], the Court orders as follows: 1. The Defendant's motion is GRANTED as to items 1-11, and 13. 2. The Defendant's motion is DENIED as to item 12 ("Witness and Exhibits not listed on Plaintiff's witnes
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS STEVEN P. SHREDER , Magistrate Judge . A. The Plaintiff's Motion in Limine and Brief in Support [Docket No. 66] is GRANTED by agreement of the parties. B. Regarding Defendant's Motion and Brief in Limine [Docket No. 62], the Court orders as follows: 1. The Defendant's motion is GRANTED as to items 1-11, and 13. 2. The Defendant's motion is DENIED as to item 12 ("Witness and Exhibits not listed on Plaintiff's witness..
More
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
STEVEN P. SHREDER, Magistrate Judge.
A. The Plaintiff's Motion in Limine and Brief in Support [Docket No. 66] is GRANTED by agreement of the parties.
B. Regarding Defendant's Motion and Brief in Limine [Docket No. 62], the Court orders as follows:
1. The Defendant's motion is GRANTED as to items 1-11, and 13.
2. The Defendant's motion is DENIED as to item 12 ("Witness and Exhibits not listed on Plaintiff's witness or exhibit list"), to be re-urged at the time of trial if appropriate.
3. The Defendant's motion is DENIED as to item 14.
C. Regarding the Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Deposition Designations for Lisa Miller [Docket No. 82], the Court orders as follows:
1. The Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Deposition Designations are GRANTED as to items 1-4, and 8-16.
2. The Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Deposition Designations are DENIED as to items 5-7, 17, and 20-21.
3. The Defendant's Objections in items 18-19 are denied as to the mention of Plaintiff Liverman but granted otherwise.
D. Regarding the Defendant's Objections to Plaintiff's Deposition Designations for Jaime Newberry Calfy [Docket No. 87], the Court orders as follows:
1. The Defendant's Objections are GRANTED as to items 1-12, 17-35 (including both objections identified as No. 35 on pp. 9-10), and 37-46.
2. The Defendant's Objections are DENIED as to items 13-16.
3. The Defendant's Objections with regard to item 36 are GRANTED as to page 146, line 1 - page 148, line 13, and DENIED as to page 148, line 14 - page 149, line 25.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
