Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Baugh v. Klingler, CIV-17-048-JHP-KEW. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Oklahoma Number: infdco20171218b23 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2017
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JAMES H. PAYNE , District Judge . Respondent has filed a motion to transfer this habeas corpus action and hold the Respondent's response in abeyance (Dkt. 7). A review of the petition indicates Petitioner is challenging his convictions and sentences entered by the District Court of Oklahoma County, which is located within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. Therefore, in the furtherance of justice, this ma
More

OPINION AND ORDER

Respondent has filed a motion to transfer this habeas corpus action and hold the Respondent's response in abeyance (Dkt. 7). A review of the petition indicates Petitioner is challenging his convictions and sentences entered by the District Court of Oklahoma County, which is located within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. Therefore, in the furtherance of justice, this matter may more properly be addressed in that Court.

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), Respondent's motion to transfer this action and hold the response in abeyance (Dkt. 7) is granted. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma for all further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer