Opinion No. 51-1128, (1951)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 28, 1951
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** MILK — MACHINES — STATUTES ** ONE MILK PROCESSOR MAY LAWFULLY PROCESS MILK FOR A DISTRIBUTOR WHO PROCESSES ITS OWN MILK AND SELLS THE SAME IN A DIFFERENT SIZE OF CONTAINER, BUT THAT, IF THE MILK SO PROCESSED IS SOLD UNDER THE TRADE NAME OF THE OTHER DISTRIBUTOR WHO DID NOT POSSESS THIS PARTICULAR MILK, THERE IS A "MISBRANDING" WHICH IS UNLAWFUL AND PROHIBITED BY 63 Ohio St. 295 .3 [ 63-295.3 ] (CONTAINERS) CITE: 63 Ohio St. 295 .3 [ 63-295.3 ] (J. H. JOHNSON)
OPINION — AG — ** MILK — MACHINES — STATUTES ** ONE MILK PROCESSOR MAY LAWFULLY PROCESS MILK FOR A DISTRIBUTOR WHO PROCESSES ITS OWN MILK AND SELLS THE SAME IN A DIFFERENT SIZE OF CONTAINER, BUT THAT, IF THE MILK SO PROCESSED IS SOLD UNDER THE TRADE NAME OF THE OTHER DISTRIBUTOR WHO DID NOT POSSESS THIS PARTICULAR MILK, THERE IS A "MISBRANDING" WHICH IS UNLAWFUL AND PROHIBITED BY 63 Ohio St. 295.3 [63-295.3] (CONTAINERS) CITE: 63 Ohio St. 295.3 [63-295.3] (J. H. JOHNSON)
Source: CourtListener
