Opinion No., (1953)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 11, 1953
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** COSMETHOLOGY — DEFINED ** QUESTION: CAN A PERSON LICENSED TO PRACTICE COSMETOLOGY AS DEFINED IN 59 Ohio St. 199 .1 [ 59-199.1 ] PRACTICE ELECTROLOGY — NEGATIVE, ONE WOULD HAVE TO OBTAIN A LICENSE FIRST. (QUALIFICATIONS) CITE: 59 Ohio St. 199 .1 [ 59-199.1 ], 59 Ohio St. 803 [ 59-803 ], 59 Ohio St. 198 .27 [59-198.27], 59 Ohio St. 812 [ 59-812 ] OPINION NO. NOVEMBER 12, 1948 — ELECTROLOGY, 59 Ohio St. 198 .3 [59-198.3] (JAMES P. GARRETT)
OPINION — AG — ** COSMETHOLOGY — DEFINED ** QUESTION: CAN A PERSON LICENSED TO PRACTICE COSMETOLOGY AS DEFINED IN 59 Ohio St. 199.1 [59-199.1] PRACTICE ELECTROLOGY ? — NEGATIVE, ONE WOULD HAVE TO OBTAIN A LICENSE FIRST. (QUALIFICATIONS) CITE: 59 Ohio St. 199.1 [59-199.1], 59 Ohio St. 803 [59-803], 59 Ohio St. 198.27 [59-198.27], 59 Ohio St. 812 [59-812] OPINION NO. NOVEMBER 12, 1948 — ELECTROLOGY, 59 Ohio St. 198.3 [59-198.3] (JAMES P. GARRETT)
Source: CourtListener
