Opinion No. 56-1130, (1956)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 30, 1956
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** QUESTION(1): ARE THE RECEIVING (ANNEXING) DISTRICTS LIABLE UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SAID CONTRACT FOR THE MONTHLY SALARY PROVIDED FOR THEREIN — THE ANNEXING DISTRICTS REFERRED TO IN YOUR LETTER WOULD BE OBLIGATED TO PERFORM AND LIABLE FOR THEIR FAILURE TO PERFORM THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT REFERRED TO IN YOUR LETTER. QUESTION(2): IF SO, WHAT PORTION OF SUCH LIABILITY SHOULD BE BORNE AND PAID BY EACH OF THE RECEIVING DISTRICTS — 70 Ohio St. 7-4 [70-7-4](B) PROVIDES THAT THE DIV
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** QUESTION(1): ARE THE RECEIVING (ANNEXING) DISTRICTS LIABLE UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SAID CONTRACT FOR THE MONTHLY SALARY PROVIDED FOR THEREIN — THE ANNEXING DISTRICTS REFERRED TO IN YOUR LETTER WOULD BE OBLIGATED TO PERFORM AND LIABLE FOR THEIR FAILURE TO PERFORM THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT REFERRED TO IN YOUR LETTER. QUESTION(2): IF SO, WHAT PORTION OF SUCH LIABILITY SHOULD BE BORNE AND PAID BY EACH OF THE RECEIVING DISTRICTS — 70 Ohio St. 7-4 [70-7-4](B) PROVIDES THAT THE DIVI..
More
OPINION — AG — ** QUESTION(1): ARE THE RECEIVING (ANNEXING) DISTRICTS LIABLE UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SAID CONTRACT FOR THE MONTHLY SALARY PROVIDED FOR THEREIN ? — THE ANNEXING DISTRICTS REFERRED TO IN YOUR LETTER WOULD BE OBLIGATED TO PERFORM AND LIABLE FOR THEIR FAILURE TO PERFORM THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT REFERRED TO IN YOUR LETTER. QUESTION(2): IF SO, WHAT PORTION OF SUCH LIABILITY SHOULD BE BORNE AND PAID BY EACH OF THE RECEIVING DISTRICTS ? — 70 Ohio St. 7-4 [70-7-4](B) PROVIDES THAT THE DIVISION OF THE OBLIGATION OF AN ANNEXED DISTRICT IS TO BE A MATTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANNEXING DISTRICTS. (ANNEXING DISTRICT, SCHOOL, TEACHER, CONTRACT, APPROVED EMPLOYMENT, AGREEMENT, OBLIGATION) CITE: ARTICLE X, SECTION 26, 70 Ohio St. 6-1 [70-6-1](E), 70 Ohio St. 7-4 [70-7-4], OPINION NO. JUNE 28, 1956, ARTICLE XXVI, SECTION 10 (RICHARD M. HUFF)
Source: CourtListener
