Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opinion No., (1961)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 03, 1961
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — 62 O.S.H. 435 WAS NOT REPEALED BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION BY 62 O.S.H. 365.5 AND THAT MANDAMUS WILL LIE TO COMPEL THE PAYMENT OF A VALID JUDGEMENT AGAINST A COUNTY WHEN THERE ARE SUFFICIENT UNENCUMBERED FUNDS IN THE SINKING FUND OF THE COUNTY TO PAY THE SAME, THAT IS, SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS ABOVE REFERRED. CITE: 74 O.S.H. 18(B), ARTICLE X, SECTION 28 (FRED HANSEN)

OPINION — AG — 62 O.S.H. 435 WAS NOT REPEALED BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION BY 62 O.S.H. 365.5 AND THAT MANDAMUS WILL LIE TO COMPEL THE PAYMENT OF A VALID JUDGEMENT AGAINST A COUNTY WHEN THERE ARE SUFFICIENT UNENCUMBERED FUNDS IN THE SINKING FUND OF THE COUNTY TO PAY THE SAME, THAT IS, SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS ABOVE REFERRED. CITE: 74 O.S.H. 18(B), ARTICLE X, SECTION 28 (FRED HANSEN)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer