Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opinion No. , 76-347, (1976)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 17, 1976
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** SCHOOL DISTRICTS — NON TEACHER PERSONNEL — BENEFITS ** THE LEGISLATURE DID NOT INTEND BY THE PASSAGE OF SENATE BILL NO. 624 OF THE THIRTY FIFTH LEGIS., ( 70 Ohio St. 1976 Supp., 6-104 [ 70-6-104 ], 70 Ohio St. 1976 Supp., 6-104.5 [ 70-6-104.5 ], 70 Ohio St. 1976 Supp., 6-105 [ 70-6-105 ], 70 Ohio St. 1976 Supp., 6-105(A)) [ 70-6-105 ] TO DESTROY PREVIOUSLY GRANTED BENEFITS TO NON TEACHER OR NON CERTIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL. TO HOLD OTHERWISE WOULD GIVE RISE TO SERIOUS CO
More

OPINION — AG — ** SCHOOL DISTRICTS — NON TEACHER PERSONNEL — BENEFITS ** THE LEGISLATURE DID NOT INTEND BY THE PASSAGE OF SENATE BILL NO. 624 OF THE THIRTY FIFTH LEGIS., (70 Ohio St. 1976 Supp., 6-104 [70-6-104], 70 Ohio St. 1976 Supp., 6-104.5 [70-6-104.5], 70 Ohio St. 1976 Supp., 6-105 [70-6-105], 70 Ohio St. 1976 Supp., 6-105(A)) [70-6-105] TO DESTROY PREVIOUSLY GRANTED BENEFITS TO NON TEACHER OR NON CERTIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL. TO HOLD OTHERWISE WOULD GIVE RISE TO SERIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION CONCERNING THE PROHIBITION AGAINST THE PASSAGE OF ANY LAW IMPAIRING CONTRACTS. CITE: 70 Ohio St. 1976 Supp., 6-104(D) [70-6-104], ARTICLE II, SECTION 15 (R. THOMAS LAY)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer