Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Opinion No. 79-116, (1979)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 3
Judges: JAN ERIC CARTWRIGHT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
Filed: May 17, 1979
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ONCE THE STATE BOARD OF VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION IS PRESENTED WITH AN OTHERWISE VALID PETITION, THAT THE STATE BOARD OF VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION HAS A STATUTORY DUTY TO ACT UPON THE PETITION. FAILURE TO ACT DOES NOT RENDER THE PETITION INVALID. THE PETITION REMAINS VALID UNTIL ACTED UPON, BY EITHER CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION OR CAUSING THE MATTER TO BE PLACED ON THE NEXT ANNUAL SCHOOL ELECTION BALLOT. CITE: 70 Ohio St. 1974 Supp., 2-101 [ 70-2-101 ], 70 Ohio St
More

OPINION — AG — ONCE THE STATE BOARD OF VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION IS PRESENTED WITH AN OTHERWISE VALID PETITION, THAT THE STATE BOARD OF VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION HAS A STATUTORY DUTY TO ACT UPON THE PETITION. FAILURE TO ACT DOES NOT RENDER THE PETITION INVALID. THE PETITION REMAINS VALID UNTIL ACTED UPON, BY EITHER CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION OR CAUSING THE MATTER TO BE PLACED ON THE NEXT ANNUAL SCHOOL ELECTION BALLOT. CITE: 70 Ohio St. 1974 Supp., 2-101 [70-2-101], 70 Ohio St. 1975 Supp., 14-108 [70-14-108](E) (JOHN F. PERCIVAL) FILENAME: m0009633 Dr. Francis Tuttle, Director, State Board of Vocational and Technical Education Attorney General of Oklahoma — Opinion May 17, 1979 JAN ERIC CARTWRIGHT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA The Attorney General's Office is in receipt of your letter wherein you ask, in effect, the following question: May an otherwise valid petition once presented to the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education be rendered invalid by the mere passage of time, where the State Board has taken no action to submit the matter to the electorate? This opinion will be limited to that narrow question. Of course, 70 Ohio St. 14-108 [70-14-108](E) (1975) grants the State Board the power to create rules and regulations for the purpose of annexation. Pursuant to such authority, the State Board has adopted rules and regulations which govern annexation of area school districts. Rules and Regulations, Vo-Tech, Part X, Section 1(b). The rules state that once a valid petition is presented to the Board, complying with procedural steps contained therein, the State Board shall call an election for the specified purpose. The rules are silent as to the length of time an otherwise valid petition remains so for the purpose for which it was presented. There is no case law or former Attorney General Opinion on the question. Title 70 Ohio St. 2-101 [70-2-101] (1974) is the specific statute which grants the Board authority to submit properly presented questions to the electorate. In essence, it provides that annual elections, for the purpose of electing board members and/or levies shall be held on the fourth Tuesday in January. On all other matters or questions authorized by law, the Board has discretion to call a special election. Elections for annexation purposes are authorized by law. 70 Ohio St. 14-108 [70-14-108](E) (1975). The gist of 70 Ohio St. 2-101 [70-2-101] (1974) is to impose upon the Board the affirmative duty to act once it has been presented with a valid petition. A clear reading of the provisions, provides that the Board may either call a special election or place the matter on the next annual school election ballot. The provision merely establishes the method(s) by which the Board must act. It does not contemplate the situation where no action is taken. Neither is there an intent to render invalid an otherwise valid petition. It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that once the State Board is presented with an otherwise valid petition, that the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education has a statutory duty to act upon the petition. Failure to act does not render the petition invalid. The petition remains valid until acted upon, by either calling a special election or causing the matter to be placed on the next annual school election ballot. (JOHN F. PERCIVAL) (ksg)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer