Opinion No. 79-169, (1979)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 25, 1979
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — (1) THE TERM "FEDERAL FUNDS" AS USED IN 70 Ohio St. 1971 , 17-108 [ 70-17-108 ] INCLUDES ANY COMPENSATION PAID TO A MEMBER OUT OF STATE FUNDS ORIGINATING WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE STATE RECEIVED THE SAME PURSUANT TO A FEDERAL GRANT, CONTRACT, OR OTHERWISE. (2) THE MATCHING PROVISION IN 70 Ohio St. 1971 , 17-108 [ 70-17-108 ], WHICH DISTINGUISHES BETWEEN FEDERAL FUNDS AND OTHER BASES OF EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REQUIRING THE EMPLOYER INST
Summary: OPINION — AG — (1) THE TERM "FEDERAL FUNDS" AS USED IN 70 Ohio St. 1971 , 17-108 [ 70-17-108 ] INCLUDES ANY COMPENSATION PAID TO A MEMBER OUT OF STATE FUNDS ORIGINATING WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE STATE RECEIVED THE SAME PURSUANT TO A FEDERAL GRANT, CONTRACT, OR OTHERWISE. (2) THE MATCHING PROVISION IN 70 Ohio St. 1971 , 17-108 [ 70-17-108 ], WHICH DISTINGUISHES BETWEEN FEDERAL FUNDS AND OTHER BASES OF EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REQUIRING THE EMPLOYER INSTI..
More
OPINION — AG — (1) THE TERM "FEDERAL FUNDS" AS USED IN 70 Ohio St. 1971, 17-108 [70-17-108] INCLUDES ANY COMPENSATION PAID TO A MEMBER OUT OF STATE FUNDS ORIGINATING WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE STATE RECEIVED THE SAME PURSUANT TO A FEDERAL GRANT, CONTRACT, OR OTHERWISE. (2) THE MATCHING PROVISION IN 70 Ohio St. 1971, 17-108 [70-17-108], WHICH DISTINGUISHES BETWEEN FEDERAL FUNDS AND OTHER BASES OF EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REQUIRING THE EMPLOYER INSTITUTION OR AGENCY TO MATCH RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS, IS CONSTITUTIONAL. (3) IF AN EMPLOYER ELECTS TO PAY THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF ITS EMPLOYEES WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, IT IS STILL OBLIGATED UNDER 70 Ohio St. 1971, 17-108 [70-17-108] TO MATCH THOSE CONTRIBUTIONS IT MAKES ON BEHALF OF MEMBERS WHOSE SALARIES ARE PAID BY FEDERALLY ORIENTED FUNDS. CITE: 70 Ohio St. 1978 Supp., 17-180.1 [70-17-180.1] (BRENT S. HAYNIE) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 87-109
Source: CourtListener