Opinion No. Ag, (1981)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 16
Judges: JAN ERIC CARTWRIGHT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
Filed: Apr. 02, 1981
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: ** CORPORATION — FOREIGN CORPORATION — REGULATION ** 79 Ohio St. 32 [79-32] IS NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL PER SE. TITLE 79 Ohio St. 31 [79-31] (1971) DOES NOT VIOLATE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION NOR DOES 79 Ohio St. 31 [79-31] (1971) DENY DUE PROCESS OF THE LAWS PURSUANT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. (RESTRAINT OF TRADE, MONOPOLY) CITE: ARTICLE II, SECTION 7 (STEPHEN F. SHANBOUR)
** CORPORATION — FOREIGN CORPORATION — REGULATION ** 79 Ohio St. 32 [79-32] IS NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL PER SE. TITLE 79 Ohio St. 31 [79-31] (1971) DOES NOT VIOLATE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION NOR DOES 79 Ohio St. 31 [79-31] (1971) DENY DUE PROCESS OF THE LAWS PURSUANT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. (RESTRAINT OF TRADE, MONOPOLY) CITE: ARTICLE II, SECTION 7 (STEPHEN F. SHANBOUR)
Source: CourtListener
