TUCKER v. McKINNEY, Civ-11-1109-R. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20120629d36
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach entered June 6, 2012. Doc. No. 49. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, Plaintiff's motion to dismiss without prejudice his claims against Defendant Jeff Davis [Doc. No. 48] is GRA
Summary: ORDER DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach entered June 6, 2012. Doc. No. 49. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, Plaintiff's motion to dismiss without prejudice his claims against Defendant Jeff Davis [Doc. No. 48] is GRAN..
More
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach entered June 6, 2012. Doc. No. 49. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, Plaintiff's motion to dismiss without prejudice his claims against Defendant Jeff Davis [Doc. No. 48] is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Jeff Davis are DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
