HIGH v. COLVIN, CIV-12-0969-HE. (2013)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20130827g14
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOE HEATON, District Judge. Plaintiff John M. High filed this action seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his applications for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, who recommends that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommenda
Summary: ORDER JOE HEATON, District Judge. Plaintiff John M. High filed this action seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his applications for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, who recommends that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendat..
More
ORDER
JOE HEATON, District Judge.
Plaintiff John M. High filed this action seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his applications for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, who recommends that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation were due by August 14, 2013.
The parties, having failed to object to the Report and Recommendation, waived their right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed United States v. 2121 E. 30th St., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) ("A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." (emphasis added)). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Purcell's Report and Recommendation [Doc. #18], and AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
