Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BREEZE v. COLVIN, CIV-13-1259-D. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Number: infdco20141119f31 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI, District Judge. Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for review of Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's final decision denying Plaintiff's application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for initial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636 (b)(1)(B). The parties fully briefed their respective positions and, on October 20,
More

ORDER

TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for review of Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's final decision denying Plaintiff's application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for initial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636 (b)(1)(B). The parties fully briefed their respective positions and, on October 20, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 21] in which he recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner.

In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge advised the parties of the right to file objections to the same and directed the parties to file any objections no later than November 10, 2014. The Magistrate Judge further admonished the parties that failure to timely object would constitute a waiver of the right to appeal. The deadline for filing objections has expired and to date, neither party has filed objections or sought an extension of time in which to do so. Upon review of the file and no timely objections having been made to the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 21] is ADOPTED in its entirety, as though fully set forth herein.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff's application for benefits is AFFIRMED. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer