SPARKMAN v. COLVIN, CIV-14-51-M. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20141226801
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, Chief District Judge. On December 02, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Acting Commissioner") denying plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits. The Magistrate Judge recommended the Acting Commissioner's decision be reversed and
Summary: ORDER VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, Chief District Judge. On December 02, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Acting Commissioner") denying plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits. The Magistrate Judge recommended the Acting Commissioner's decision be reversed and ..
More
ORDER
VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, Chief District Judge.
On December 02, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Acting Commissioner") denying plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits. The Magistrate Judge recommended the Acting Commissioner's decision be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings. The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by December 22, 2014. A review of the file reveals no objection has been filed.
Upon de novo review, the Court:
(1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on December 02, 2014;
(2) REVERSES the decision of the Acting Commissioner;
(3) REMANDS for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation; and
(4) ORDERS that judgment issue forthwith in accordance with the provisions of sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
