Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STAGGS-HOMADY v. COLVIN, CIV-13-1368-D. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Number: infdco20150102977 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge. Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for review of the Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's final decision denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for initial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636 (b)(1)(B). The parties fully briefed their respective positions and on
More

ORDER

TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for review of the Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's final decision denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for initial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636 (b)(1)(B). The parties fully briefed their respective positions and on December 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] in which he recommended that the Court reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand the matter for further proceedings.

In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge advised the parties of the right to file objections to the same and directed the parties to file any objections no later than December 22, 2014. The Magistrate Judge further admonished the parties that failure to timely object would constitute a waiver of the right to appeal. The deadline for filing objections has expired and to date, neither party has filed objections or sought an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No.13] is ADOPTED as though fully set forth herein.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income is REVERSED. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, as more fully set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer