Kinkead v. Sutmiller, CIV-13-49-R. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20150203e12
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Doc. No. 99. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff's Motion Seeking Prospective Relief from Arbitrary Removal of Psychotropic Medication Without Due Process and/or Just Cause [Doc. No.
Summary: ORDER DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Doc. No. 99. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff's Motion Seeking Prospective Relief from Arbitrary Removal of Psychotropic Medication Without Due Process and/or Just Cause [Doc. No. ..
More
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. Doc. No. 99. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff's Motion Seeking Prospective Relief from Arbitrary Removal of Psychotropic Medication Without Due Process and/or Just Cause [Doc. No. 91] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
