LUCIANI v. COLVIN, CIV-14-254-C. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20150312e76
Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROBIN J. CAUTHRON , District Judge . This action for judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance benefits was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation on January 27, 2015, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Plaintiff, through counsel, has timely filed an objection to this report, and the Court there
Summary: ORDER ROBIN J. CAUTHRON , District Judge . This action for judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance benefits was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation on January 27, 2015, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Plaintiff, through counsel, has timely filed an objection to this report, and the Court theref..
More
ORDER
ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge.
This action for judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance benefits was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation on January 27, 2015, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Plaintiff, through counsel, has timely filed an objection to this report, and the Court therefore considers the matter de novo.
In his thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, Judge Purcell sets out the relevant facts and prevailing law, and no purpose would be served to repeat those here. The arguments raised in the Objection were fairly addressed and properly rejected in the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff raises nothing which would require a different result.
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 13), and for the reasons stated therein, the decision of the Commissioner in this case is affirmed. A judgment will enter accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
