Decker v. Braggs, CIV-18-443-C. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20180913j64
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBIN J. CAUTHRON , District Judge . This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner through his attorney, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Mitchell entered a Report and Recommendation on August 21, 2018, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo. The facts and law are accurately set out in Judg
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBIN J. CAUTHRON , District Judge . This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner through his attorney, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Mitchell entered a Report and Recommendation on August 21, 2018, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo. The facts and law are accurately set out in Judge..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge.
This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner through his attorney, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Mitchell entered a Report and Recommendation on August 21, 2018, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.
The facts and law are accurately set out in Judge Mitchell's Report and Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In the objection, Petitioner merely restates the conclusions and legal arguments originally asserted, and raises no issue not fully and accurately addressed and rejected by the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 12), and for the reasons announced therein, the petition for habeas corpus relief is dismissed, as untimely. As no amendment can cure the defect, this dismissal acts as an adjudication on the merits, and a judgment will enter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
