Kirk v. 1568-Deaconess Physician Clinics, CIV-18-1153-D. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20181210e76
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI , District Judge . Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is moot due to Plaintiff's filing of the Amended Complaint as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515 , 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (amended pleading "supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect") (internal quotation omitted); see also Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177 , 1180-81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suth
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI , District Judge . Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is moot due to Plaintiff's filing of the Amended Complaint as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515 , 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (amended pleading "supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect") (internal quotation omitted); see also Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177 , 1180-81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthe..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI, District Judge.
Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is moot due to Plaintiff's filing of the Amended Complaint as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (amended pleading "supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect") (internal quotation omitted); see also Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180-81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is DENIED without prejudice to resubmission, if appropriate, in response to the Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
