Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kirk v. 1568-Deaconess Physician Clinics, CIV-18-1153-D. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Number: infdco20181210e76 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI , District Judge . Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is moot due to Plaintiff's filing of the Amended Complaint as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515 , 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (amended pleading "supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect") (internal quotation omitted); see also Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177 , 1180-81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suth
More

ORDER

Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is moot due to Plaintiff's filing of the Amended Complaint as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (amended pleading "supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect") (internal quotation omitted); see also Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180-81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is DENIED without prejudice to resubmission, if appropriate, in response to the Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer