Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Griggs v. Vanguard Group, Inc., CIV-17-1187-SLP. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Number: infdco20190529g76 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 28, 2019
Latest Update: May 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER SCOTT L. PALK , District Judge . Before the Court are (i) Defendants' Opposed Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Regarding Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notices and Brief in Support for Failure to Comply with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(e) [Doc. No. 58] and (ii) Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Allow the Second Motion to Compel to Exceed the Page Limitation set forth in Local Rule 7.1(e) and for Leave to Make this Request Out of Time [Doc. No. 60]. Plaintiff filed a r
More

ORDER

Before the Court are (i) Defendants' Opposed Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Regarding Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notices and Brief in Support for Failure to Comply with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(e) [Doc. No. 58] and (ii) Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Allow the Second Motion to Compel to Exceed the Page Limitation set forth in Local Rule 7.1(e) and for Leave to Make this Request Out of Time [Doc. No. 60]. Plaintiff filed a response brief [Doc. No. 61] to Defendants' Motion. Upon consideration of the parties' requests and respective positions, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED and Defendants' motion is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Allow the Second Motion to Compel to Exceed the Page Limitation set forth in Local Rule 7.1(e) and for Leave to Make this Request Out of Time [Doc. No. 60] is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted leave for her Second Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 48] to exceed the 25 pages allowed by Local Civil Rule 7.1(e) by three pages, and such permission will be deemed to have been granted as of the date of filing of the Second Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 48].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Opposed Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Regarding Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notices and Brief in Support for Failure to Comply with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(e) [Doc. No. 58] is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer