Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lee v. Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City, CIV-19-622-D. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Number: infdco20190829b92 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. No. 10], filed on August 6, 2019. During the pendency of the motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 11]. This Amended Complaint supersedes Plaintiff's original pleading and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515 , 1517 (10 th Cir. 1991); Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 117
More

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. No. 10], filed on August 6, 2019. During the pendency of the motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 11]. This Amended Complaint supersedes Plaintiff's original pleading and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991); Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180-1181 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007). Thus, Defendant's motion directed at the Complaint is moot.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 10] is DENIED as moot, without prejudice to refiling a motion directed at the Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer