Shingleton v. Berryhill, CIV-18-838-PRW. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20190916942
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER PATRICK R. WYRICK , District Judge . On May 2, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action in which Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the final decision of Defendant that he was not "disabled" under the terms of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), 423(d)(1)(A) (Dkt. 20). The Magistrate Judge recommends Defendant's decision in this matter be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent wi
Summary: ORDER PATRICK R. WYRICK , District Judge . On May 2, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action in which Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the final decision of Defendant that he was not "disabled" under the terms of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), 423(d)(1)(A) (Dkt. 20). The Magistrate Judge recommends Defendant's decision in this matter be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent wit..
More
ORDER
PATRICK R. WYRICK, District Judge.
On May 2, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action in which Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the final decision of Defendant that he was not "disabled" under the terms of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 423(d)(1)(A) (Dkt. 20). The Magistrate Judge recommends Defendant's decision in this matter be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by May 23, 2019, and Defendant did so on that date (Dkt. 21).
Having carefully reviewed this matter de novo, the Court:
(1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 20) issued by the Magistrate Judge on May 2, 2019,
(2) REVERSES the decision of Defendant,
(3) REMANDS for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation, and
(4) ORDERS that judgment issue forthwith in accordance with the provisions of sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
