RODRIGUEZ-CARO v. MILLS, 09-CV-133-ST. (2011)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20110502751
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 27, 2011
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2011
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#34) on February 25, 2011, in which she recommends the Court deny Petitioner Jose C. Rodriguez-Caro's Petition (#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, dismiss this matter with prejudice, and deny Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#34) on February 25, 2011, in which she recommends the Court deny Petitioner Jose C. Rodriguez-Caro's Petition (#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, dismiss this matter with prejudice, and deny Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge'..
More
ORDER
ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#34) on February 25, 2011, in which she recommends the Court deny Petitioner Jose C. Rodriguez-Caro's Petition (#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, dismiss this matter with prejudice, and deny Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#34) and, accordingly, DENIES the Petition (#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, DISMISSES this matter with prejudice, and DENIES a Certificate of Appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
