Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROBERTS v. ASTRUE, 3:10-CV-446-AC. (2011)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20111222d65 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2011
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#20) on October 11, 2011, in which he recommends this Court should affirm the decision of the Commissioner that Plaintiff is not disabled and is not entitled to benefits. Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d
More

ORDER

ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#20) on October 11, 2011, in which he recommends this Court should affirm the decision of the Commissioner that Plaintiff is not disabled and is not entitled to benefits.

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983) (rev'd on other grounds). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#20). Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer