BLODGETT v. ASTRUE, 1:10-cv-01177-CL. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20120224d12
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the strate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309 , 1313 (9th Cir.
Summary: ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the strate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309 , 1313 (9th Cir. 1..
More
ORDER
OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the strate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Here, intiff objects to the Report and Recommendation, so I review smatter de novo. I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits.
CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#18) is adopted. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
