KOFOED v. KROGER, 3:11-CV-00444-AC. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20120309c28
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2012
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#58) on January 20, 2012, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendants' Motion (#22) to Dismiss and dismiss this matter with prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligatio
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#58) on January 20, 2012, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendants' Motion (#22) to Dismiss and dismiss this matter with prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation..
More
ORDER
ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#58) on January 20, 2012, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendants' Motion (#22) to Dismiss and dismiss this matter with prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#58). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#22) to Dismiss, DENIES as moot Plaintiff's Motion (#62) to Extend Discovery Cutoff, and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
