Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LINDSEY v. MYER, 2:10-cv-1437-SU. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20120403b88 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation (#53) on February 13, 2012, in which she recommends that this Court grant the Blackman Defendants' motion to dismiss in part and deny it in part, and further recommends that this Court grant the Municipal and Myers Defendants' motion to dismiss in part and deny it in part. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because n
More

ORDER

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation (#53) on February 13, 2012, in which she recommends that this Court grant the Blackman Defendants' motion to dismiss in part and deny it in part, and further recommends that this Court grant the Municipal and Myers Defendants' motion to dismiss in part and deny it in part.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings & Recommendation [53]. Accordingly, the Blackman Defendants' motion to dismiss [25] is granted in part and denied in part and the Municipal and Myers Defendants' motion to dismiss [27] is granted in part and denied in part. As a result, plaintiffs' First, Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and Twelfth Claims set forth in plaintiffs' Complaint are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer