FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL v. BROOKSIDE VILLAGE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, 3:08-cv-03127-ST. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20130509c49
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 08, 2013
Latest Update: May 08, 2013
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (doc. #146) on October 19, 2012. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's F&R. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's F&R, the district court must make a de novo review of that portion. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); D
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (doc. #146) on October 19, 2012. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's F&R. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's F&R, the district court must make a de novo review of that portion. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Da..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (doc. #146) on October 19, 2012. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's F&R. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's F&R, the district court must make a de novo review of that portion. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude that the objections do not provide a basis to modify the F&R. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no error in the Magistrate Judge's F&R.
CONCLUSION
The Magistrate Judge's F&R (doc. #146) is ADOPTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
