Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McLEAN v. SHELTON, 3:11-cv-01535-AC. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20130805974
Filed: Aug. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2013
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (dkt. #42) on June 7, 2013, recommending that Plaintiff's claims against Doe defendants be dismissed and that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims be denied. Because no objections to the F&R were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 , 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also Unit
More

ORDER

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (dkt. #42) on June 7, 2013, recommending that Plaintiff's claims against Doe defendants be dismissed and that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims be denied.

Because no objections to the F&R were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Judge Acosta's F&R (dkt. #42). Defendants' motion to dismiss (dkt. # ) is granted in part and denied in part consistent with Judge Acosta's F&R.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer