MARCUS v. COLVIN, 6:13-cv-01011-AA. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20140625g37
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2014
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER ANN AIKEN, District Judge. Plaintiff, Mike Marcus ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to the Social Security Act ("Act") to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying his application for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI"). Plaintiff brings this action challenging the Commissioner's determination that he is ineligible for SSI because he is not a U.S. citizen. Plaintiff's wife brought a companion case: To
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER ANN AIKEN, District Judge. Plaintiff, Mike Marcus ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to the Social Security Act ("Act") to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying his application for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI"). Plaintiff brings this action challenging the Commissioner's determination that he is ineligible for SSI because he is not a U.S. citizen. Plaintiff's wife brought a companion case: Tom..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
ANN AIKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Mike Marcus ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to the Social Security Act ("Act") to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying his application for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI"). Plaintiff brings this action challenging the Commissioner's determination that he is ineligible for SSI because he is not a U.S. citizen.
Plaintiff's wife brought a companion case: Tomiko Marcus v. Colvin, No. 6:13-cv-01009-AA (D. Or. 2014) raising identical issues based on the same factual background. For the reasons outlined in the opinion issued in Tomiko Marcus v. Colvin, the Commissioner's decision is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
CONCLUSION
The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion issued in Tomiko Marcus v. Colvin, No. 6:13-cv-01009-AA (D. Or. 2014).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
