LILLEY v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 1:13-cv-01153-CL. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20141231c04
Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#35), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd. , 700 F.2d 1202 , 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). Although Plaintiffs have not filed either a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (#27) or objections to
Summary: ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#35), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd. , 700 F.2d 1202 , 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). Although Plaintiffs have not filed either a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (#27) or objections to M..
More
ORDER
OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#35), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).
Although Plaintiffs have not filed either a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (#27) or objections to Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (#35), I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation (#35). Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (#27) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
