EWBANK v. RICHARDSON, 6:14-cv-612-TC. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20150130f20
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN, District Judge. Pro se plaintiff brings this action asserting due process and equal protection violations. On November 11, 2014, Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin recommended granting a motion to dismiss and for summary judgment. However, Judge Coffin also recommended that plaintiffs motion to file an amended complaint, with respect to a claim for retaliation, should be granted. Plaintiff filed objections to the recommendations on November 28, 2014. On December 16, 2014, after r
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN, District Judge. Pro se plaintiff brings this action asserting due process and equal protection violations. On November 11, 2014, Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin recommended granting a motion to dismiss and for summary judgment. However, Judge Coffin also recommended that plaintiffs motion to file an amended complaint, with respect to a claim for retaliation, should be granted. Plaintiff filed objections to the recommendations on November 28, 2014. On December 16, 2014, after re..
More
ORDER
ANN AIKEN, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff brings this action asserting due process and equal protection violations. On November 11, 2014, Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin recommended granting a motion to dismiss and for summary judgment. However, Judge Coffin also recommended that plaintiffs motion to file an amended complaint, with respect to a claim for retaliation, should be granted. Plaintiff filed objections to the recommendations on November 28, 2014.
On December 16, 2014, after reviewing the case de novo, this court adopted the recommendations and ordered plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. The court explicitly warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in dismissal of this case. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to follow a court order.
Source: Leagle
