Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BECKER v. WILLAMETTE COMMUNITY BANK, 6:12-cv-01427-TC. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20150326f67 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN , Chief District Judge . On December 30, 2014, Magistrate Judge Coffin issued an order granting defendant's motion for protective order, with slight modification, and denying plaintiff's motion to compel. Plaintiff now objects. When either party timely objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's ruling on a non-dispositive pretrial matter, the district court may set aside any portion of the ruling found to be "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1)
More

ORDER

On December 30, 2014, Magistrate Judge Coffin issued an order granting defendant's motion for protective order, with slight modification, and denying plaintiff's motion to compel. Plaintiff now objects.

When either party timely objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's ruling on a non-dispositive pretrial matter, the district court may set aside any portion of the ruling found to be "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). I find Magistrate Judge Coffin's ruling to be neither of the above. To the contrary, Magistrate Judge Coffin's thorough reasoning and slight modification of defendant's limited wavier is reasonable, fair, and supported by the evidence presented thus far.

Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Coffin's Order (doc. 150) is ADOPTED in its entirety and plaintiff's Objections (doc. 154) are denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer