Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JAMES v. MILLS, 1:10-cv-00202-CL. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20150416e15 Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER OWEN M. PANNER , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#56), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd. , 700 F.2d 1202 , 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation (#56).
More

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#56), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation (#56). The Petition (#2) is DENIED. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No certificate of appealability shall issue as petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c) (2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Court's Order adopting the Findings and Recommendations of Hon. Magistrate Judge Clarke (#56), the Petition (#2) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer