KEAY v. COLVIN, 3:14-cv-01355-SU. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20150813b85
Visitors: 22
Filed: Aug. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings & Recommendation [34] on June 16, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment [24]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings & Recommendation [34] on June 16, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment [24]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de n..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings & Recommendation [34] on June 16, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment [24]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings & Recommendation [34]. Accordingly, Defendant's motion for summary judgment [24] is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
