Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DeARMITT v. NOOTH, 2:13-cv-0607-CL. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20150818b01 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Clark issued Findings and Recommendation in the above-captioned case, recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied and this case dismissed. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's r
More

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Clark issued Findings and Recommendation in the above-captioned case, recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied and this case dismissed. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Upon de novo review, I find no error with Magistrate Judge Clarke's thorough analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 46) is ADOPTED in its entirety. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 2) is DENIED. This action is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer