NELSON v. FISKARS BRANDS, INC., 03:14-CV-00685-SB. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20150918847
Filed: Sep. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings & Recommendation (#35) on July 10, 2015, in which she recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When any party objects to any portion of the Magi
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings & Recommendation (#35) on July 10, 2015, in which she recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When any party objects to any portion of the Magis..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings & Recommendation (#35) on July 10, 2015, in which she recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation [35], and therefore, Defendant's motion for summary judgment [17] is granted and Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment [20] is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
