MOSS v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, 1:06-cv-3045-CL. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20150929e12
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke has filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court reviews that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report de novo. 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309 , 1313 (9th Cir
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke has filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court reviews that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report de novo. 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309 , 1313 (9th Cir...
More
ORDER
ANN AIKEN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke has filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court reviews that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Here, Plaintiffs and Defendants have filed timely objections, so I have reviewed the file de novo.
I agree with the Report and Recommendation that Plaintiffs' motion for class certification should be granted as to Plaintiffs' claims for unlawful arrest and false imprisonment, and denied as to Plaintiffs' other claims.
CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#301) is adopted. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (#289) is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
