DULCICH INC. v. COORDINATED CARE PROGRAMS, LLC, 3:15-cv-01522-SB. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20160127a11
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#18) on December 23, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court deny Dulcich's motion to remand and deny CCP's motion to transfer venue. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review t
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#18) on December 23, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court deny Dulcich's motion to remand and deny CCP's motion to transfer venue. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review th..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#18) on December 23, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court deny Dulcich's motion to remand and deny CCP's motion to transfer venue. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation [18]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to remand [11] is denied and CCP's motion transfer venue [7] is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
