Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Aequitas Management, LLC, 3:16-cv-00438-PK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20171212d13 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2017
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued an Opinion & Order [470] on July 7, 2017, ordering that Individual Defendants' Motion for Protective Order [428] be denied. Individual Defendants have timely filed objections [479] to the Opinion & Order. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a). When a party objects to a nondispositive matter, "[t]he district judge in the case must consider ti
More

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued an Opinion & Order [470] on July 7, 2017, ordering that Individual Defendants' Motion for Protective Order [428] be denied. Individual Defendants have timely filed objections [479] to the Opinion & Order. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a). When a party objects to a nondispositive matter, "[t]he district judge in the case must consider timely objections and modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

The Court has carefully considered Individual Defendants' objections and concludes that no part of the Opinion & Order was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

CONCLUSION

The Court declines to modify or set aside any part of the Opinion & Order [470].

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer